Belgija – Ekonominių tyrimų paslaugos – Comparative study on best practices for a stronger EU sanction enforcement
Belgija – Ekonominių tyrimų paslaugos – Comparative study on best practices for a stronger EU sanction enforcement
I dalis: Perkančioji organizacija
I.1) Pavadinimas ir adresai:
Oficialus
pavadinimas: European Commission, DG FISMA - Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
Adresas: The Pavilion (SPA2), Rue de Spa 2
Miestas: Brussels
Pašto
kodas: B-1000
Šalis: Belgija
Asmuo
ryšiams:
El-paštas: ec-fisma-contracts@ec.europa.eu
Interneto adresas (-ai):
II dalis: Objektas
II.1.1) Pavadinimas:
Comparative study on best practices for a stronger EU sanction enforcement
Nuorodos numeris: EC-FISMA/2024/OP/0007-PIN
II.1.2) Pagrindinis BVPŽ kodas:
79311400
Mokslinių tyrimų ir taikomosios veiklos konsultacinės paslaugos
II.1.3) Sutarties tipas:
Kita
II.1.4) Trumpas aprašymas:
Restrictive measures (sanctions) are an essential tool for the promotion of the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Their objectives include safeguarding the Union’s values, maintaining international peace and security, consolidating and supporting democracy, the rule of law and human rights. The sanctions remain the main
instrument in the Union’s toolbox to deter, prevent and condemn aggressive and illiberal behaviour of the third
countries.
Considering that the lack of sanction implementation, as well as inconsistencies across different jurisdictions of the Union, also represent a risk to Union financial interests and to the national financial systems, it is important to make sure that the Union sanctions are implemented equally across the Union. This is particularly relevant for the implementation of the Union sanctions against Russia, which have been subsequently adopted starting from 2014.
In order to curb circumvention of Union sanctions and assist the Member States in their sanction implementation
tasks, this pilot project concerns a study on the best practices and synergies that would benefit the Union’s sanction policy, taking stock of the examples of the United States’ Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the United Kingdom sanctions enforcement authority (OFSI). This would help to identify similarities, disparities, best practices and missing elements across all the jurisdictions of the Union.
Considering that each Member State nominates a very different set and number of national authorities for the
enforcement of Union sanctions (currently at least 160 officially designated), it would be useful to see to what extent having a centralised sanction implementation body would benefit Union sanction implementation, as compared to a network of scattered national bodies. Such a study would help to identify a way for reducing ‘avoidable’ sanction evasion, namely in terms of asset freeze and confiscation and visa and travel bans.
II.2) Aprašymas:
II.2.1) Kitas (-i) šio pirkimo BVPŽ kodas (-ai):
73200000 Mokslinių tyrimų ir taikomosios veiklos konsultacinės paslaugos
79311400 Ekonominių tyrimų paslaugos